09 October 2013
References: Rev. Liberato C. Bautista (LBautista@umc-gbcs.org)
: Mr. Mervin Toquero (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Church and migrant groups challenge migration as tool for development, assert migrants are human beings not tradable commodities in the global market
Human rights, sustainability and development justice form the basis for a just migration policy
New York, 8 October 2013—Migrants are human beings who cannot be reduced to mere commodities to be traded and exchanged in the global market. This bold declaration is part of a 17-point advocacy paper issued by about 100 representatives of some 60 churches, ecumenical groups, and migrant organizations from around the world who met in New York City on the eve of the Second United Nations High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development (UN HLD).
The Fourth International Consultation of Churches Witnessing with Migrants (CWWM4) met on October 1 and 2, 2013 at the Church Center for the United Nations in New York City. It registered its displeasure with the insignificant participation of migrants at an international high-level political gathering of “non-migrants” that discussed the issue of migration as a tool for development. The consultation asserted that, “A true and meaningful dialogue includes migrants as subjects of their own destinies and puts primacy to their human rights and welfare.”
In his keynote address, Dr. Deenabandhu Manchala, programme executive for the Just and Inclusive Communities Programme of the World Council of Churches, Geneva, wanted the churches to give visibility to the reality of forced migration which makes many people vulnerable to many forms of abuse and exploitation.
Addressing the theme of the consultation, “The ‘Other’ Is My Neighbour,” Dr Manchala said that the neighbour in Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan is not our next-door friend, family member, or work colleague, but the nameless and faceless victim, beaten and bruised, and left abandoned by the roadside. “It reminds us that Christian love for neighbour, if only demonstrated within circles of familiarity and ignores those the society considers ‘the others’ and ‘the inferior’, betrays the essential Christian calling.”
“The commandment also implies that you must not only love your neighbour because she/he is in need or suffering but also even if you don’t know them by name and face, even a stranger! To that extent, all of us, human beings, are neighbours to each other, even if our identity markers are different for each,” he added.
The theme was also the title of a book that was launched at the consultation. This theological statement on migration and its ecclesiological and missiological implications is the culmination of a year-long study process initiated by the WCC. Rev. Michael Blair of the United Church of Canada reviewed the book and its usefulness to churches in different contexts. Manchala and Blair noted that the study and the consultation’s advocacy paper would inform the 10th general assembly of the World Council of Churches which meets from October 30 to November 8, 2013 in Busan, South Korea.
The keynote address of Mr. Garry Martinez, chairperson of Migrante International reinforced Manchala’s position. “Forced migration is an anomaly. Ours is now an era of modern-day slavery wherein governments, in need of hard currencies, continue to subject migrants and their families to most cruel conditions even while greedily buffeting their domestic economies with the hard-earned monies remitted by migrants.”
“There can be no human rights if migration is by necessity and not by choice. There can be no genuine and sustainable development if governments continue to consider money remittances as lifelines for the national economy but does not redound to the welfare of its producers—the migrants and their families. Migrants are human beings first before they are workers. They are not mere statistics to buttress a country’s Gross Domestic Product,” Martinez stressed.
Both Manchala and Martinez affirmed the freedom of movement of peoples as a human right and that forced migration is a violation of that right. The consultation’s advocacy paper called for a migration policy and framework based on human rights, sustainability and development justice.
Such framework, the consultation declared, makes urgent the immediate securing of the well-being, safety and sustainability of migrants and the strategic fight for greater justice. The fight includes addressing global and structural inequalities brought about by colonial and neo-colonial exploitation and plunder and the current unjust international trade, investment and financial regimes that have led to the “destruction of livelihoods and the basis for unsustainable development in poor countries.”
The consultation lamented—in fact, it said “we resist”—the “unfettered movement of capital while the movement of peoples is highly restricted”. It celebrated the organizing of migrants and their resistance to structures that “perpetuated their continued oppression and exploitation.” The consultation affirmed ‘development justice” as a principle by which the human rights of all, including migrants, are fully realized and individual and collective well-being of the people and the environment is secured.
The voice and presence of the migrant is primary when their condition as peoples and their rights as migrants are on the negotiating table. Migrants addressed the consultation with their presence and voice, presenting stories and narratives that addressed both their pains and joys and pains, but more importantly, their struggles and triumphs in asserting their dignity and protecting their rights. Such voices included Ms. Eni Lestari (an Indonesian woman based in Hong Kong and chair of the International Migrants Alliance) Mr. Rex Osa (a refugee from Nigeria, representing Karawane/TheVoice, based in Germany) and Sra. Rosa Martha Macias Zarate (singer and composer, and advocate for the Alianza de Ex-Braceros del Norte of Mexico). Ms. Vivi Akakpo presented African perspectives and Tabitha Sabiiti, who jointly represented the All Africa Conference of Churches based in Nairobi, Kenya, with an advocacy office at the African Union in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
The seven calls that came out of the consultation include the institutionalization of a UN-directed periodic review process to check UN member states on their adherence to and implementation of already available international human rights and labor standards. It also called for the promotion of dialogues for cooperation between and among states aimed at improving the welfare of migrants, including an end to the extraction of cheap labor from migrants; a state regulation on private recruitment and finance agencies; and the protection of migrants in vulnerable and at risk conditions, especially undocumented migrants and domestic workers.
The consultation strongly urged all UN member states to ratify UN and ILO conventions, particularly the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families and ILO Convention 189 concerning decent work for domestic workers. It was unanimous in urging to stop classifying migrants as threats to national security.
Speaking as Asia Pacific Forum (US and Canada) co-chair hosting the consultation, the Rev. Liberato Bautista, assistant general secretary for United Nations and international affairs of the General Board of Church and Society of The United Methodist Church, described the consultation calls as matters which are deeply embedded in biblical, theological and ethical understandings of churches and other religious and faith traditions. “Our advocacy for justice, sustainability, human dignity, and the human rights of migrants comes out of our witness with and among migrants and their organizations—a witness of a God whose hospitality is profuse and radical and whose love is unbounded and unconditional.”
CWWM participants approved the advocacy paper as a tool to lobby for a migration framework based on human rights, sustainability, and development justice. Governmental delegates of Norway and Sweden and representatives of the UN Human Rights Council, and Mr. François Crépeau, the UN Special Rapporteur on Migrant Workers, who were attending the UN HLD, have been in dialogue with leaders of CWWM and received the advocacy paper. Consultation participants have also distributed versions of the advocacy paper to other UN HLD delegations. Several participants committed to produce study guides of the advocacy paper to aid education, organizing and mobilizing work at all levels among varied groups. The study guides will refer to the WCC document and cite other important references from migrant, church, ecumenical and interreligious groups.
Additionally, participants affirmed the proposal of making the CWWM a regular platform for common advocacy among churches and ecumenical bodies, migrants through the International Migrants Alliance (IMA), and other religions and faith communities. To reflect the increasing interreligious composition of the CWWM, a new name will be chosen, possibly in 2014 in Stockholm, Sweden, when it meets on the sides of the annual meeting of the Global Forum on Migration and Development.
The National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP) and Migrante International initially conceived CWWM. From the three previous smaller consultations held successively in Manila, Athens, and Mexico, to the fourth international consultation in New York, participation has considerably grown. The New York event gathered many migrant, church, and ecumenical groups that included the World Council of Churches, Lutheran World Federation, Baptist World Alliance, All Africa Conference of Churches, Latin American Council of Churches, Migrante International, Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants, International Alliance of Migrants, and many more. The consultation included representatives of four Roman Catholic religious orders and one lay group. Significant support came from members of the WCC-initiated Global Ecumenical Migration Network. The support of Karibu Foundation of Norway and the United Church of Canada has made possible the significant representation of migrant groups from the Global South at the consultation.
Mr. Mervin Toquero of NCCP, and leads the CWWM Secretariat based in Manila, Philippines, called the consultation significant and successful. “Beyond witnessing, we left New York with a solid commitment to oppose forces and dynamics that breed forced migration, continue to deny welfare to migrants, and denigrate their dignity and violate their rights.” He prayed that God’s abundant grace be upon those “deprived of a life lived with dignity but denied with rights like the millions of migrants and their families around the world”.
CWWM4 Advocacy Paper: The Intersections of Migration, Human Rights and Development Justice
(Issued on the occasion of the Second United Nations High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development, 2013)
- Every person bears the inherent gift of the likeness of God. Human dignity cannot be taken away — not by any one, any government, or any public or private entity. We honor human dignity by generating, affirming and ensuring human rights. Peoples transact these obligations with each other, with their governments and in the international community. Human rights include freedom of movement, adequate livelihood, decent job, living wage, and freedom from discrimination based on race, gender and class. Human rights constitute the right to live freely in safety and without fear, including recourse to a justice system that fairly redresses grievances wherever people are located. Any system or process that ignores human dignity is an affront to God’s will and violates human rights.
- Migrants are human beings with dignity and worth who cannot be reduced to mere commodities traded and exchanged in the global market place. Not even structures of injustice in the global market system can strip them of their dignity and worth. A true and meaningful dialogue includes migrants as subjects of their own destinies and puts primacy to their human rights and welfare. Such dialogue must not be limited to migration as a strategy for development. We must challenge policies and priorities set by international institutions and national governments that allot more funds to profit enterprises and military and defense budgets and lesser to education, health, decent labor and the environment.
- Freedom of movement is a human right that allows peoples to forge human relations and found sustainable communities. Forced migration is a violation of human rights. Violent situations, environmental degradation, militarization, wars, lingering conflicts and political persecution in countries have resulted in internal displacement and forced and external movement of peoples that have produced asylum seekers and massive numbers of refugees. Under such conditions, people have fled their communities and sought refuge elsewhere, including in other countries. In situations like these, indigenous peoples, women, children, and peoples with disabilities who are migrants or are family members of migrants are especially more at risk and vulnerable. A meaningful dialogue on migration must address these, including refugees and asylum-seekers.
- Exploitative economic conditions, unregulated and expanding access of multinational corporations to natural resources, extreme poverty, and natural and human-made calamities have forced peoples to migrate. Under forced migration, there are little or no viable and sustainable options. This could mean living in sub-human conditions that diminish self-worth and limit the full enjoyment of human rights. Enjoying their human rights means being protected from racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. It means women are liberated from gender-based economic, political and cultural systems and structures. Only then, migrants fully and freely contribute to the sustainable development and well-being of not just themselves but of their host countries.
- The prophet Micah envisioned what makes for security and sustainability: “… They shall all sit under their own vines and under their own fig trees, and no one shall make them afraid; for the mouth of the Lord of hosts has spoken”(Micah 4:4). This vision addresses the right of all peoples to stay, prosper and live with provision and without fear anywhere, be it in their own countries or as migrants in another. This vision shapes our understanding of development that respects, protects, and fulfills the human rights of all peoples irrespective of their location and status in life.
- As churches and ecumenical communities witnessing with migrants, we give premium to concerns and human rights struggles of migrants and their families which are about their dignity, the viability of their family relationships, and the security and sustainability of their communities wherever they are found: in their homelands or in other lands. By asserting the universality of human rights, we also assert the inclusive character of human rights of migrant workers: their civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights.
- We enter into dialogues on migration cognizant of migrants’ stories and narratives and their critique of neoliberal globalization, especially its impact on their lives, livelihoods and social relations. The magnitude of neoliberal globalization, and attendant deepening of structural inequalities within countries, and between countries and regions, have commodified further both human beings and their labor, unduly privileging profit and unsustainable development practices. Under neoliberal globalization, measures for the respect and protection of the rights and welfare of migrants and their families, and the right to development of nations, have been subordinated to considerations about financial costs and benefits for migrant origin and destination countries.
- Exploitation of migrant workers and grave violations of their human rights have taken numerous forms, including labor flexibilization, human trafficking, sexual abuse, harsh living and working conditions, social exclusion of migrants including marriage migrants, domestic workers, au pairs, refugees, and child laborers. The abuse becomes even more tragic, and support and protection more acute among undocumented migrants. We uphold the dignity of migrants and their families by protecting their human rights regardless of their legal status. Tragically, not a single country of migrant destination has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (2003).
- When viewed from the framework of human rights, the well-being, safety and sustainability of migrants becomes as urgent as their fight for justice. Bilateral and multilateral negotiations all too often focus on the management of migration for the maintenance of economic prosperity and security of destination countries. These negotiations have resulted into restrictive migration and immigration legislations, including job and wage conditions that are far from decent and sustainable, thus violating migrants’ rights and disregarding their concerns.
- We resist the unfettered movement of capital while the movement of peoples is highly restricted. Managing migration for development perpetuates global and structural inequalities and obscures the unjust international trade, investment and financial regime set by the advanced countries. This regime leads to the destruction of livelihoods and forms the basis for unsustainable development in poor countries, forcing millions of working people to seek economic opportunities in foreign lands. The negotiations largely ignore centuries of colonial and neo-colonial exploitation and plunder that have consigned colonized countries to perpetual bouts of extreme poverty internally and economic dependence externally.
- A migration framework based on human rights, sustainability and development justice recognizes fundamental issues of global inequality and injustice and moves to address them. The failure of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), even with some strides among its modest targets, lies in the gutting out of human rights as a fundamental framework for eradicating poverty and mobilizing national and international political will and cooperation. A post-MDG, post-2015 development agenda must contemplate on sustainable development goals that include clear policies that eliminate the overreliance on migrant workers by migrant sending countries for their hard currency reserves and on migration as an engine for national development.
- The overemphasis on migrant remittances serves to inflate governmental assessment of Gross Domestic Product but is in fact a flawed representation of development. Such representation provides excuses for governments to disregard the structural problems of poverty, unemployment, and weak economic fundamentals, such as just taxation on business and corporate interests. Policies on migration must effectively reduce social inequalities by addressing the underlying global and social structures that perpetuate economic imbalances that induce and include migration, among many others. Such policies must include fostering sustainable development and the generation of employment that includes decent jobs and wages and respect for labor rights.
- Migrants are organizing and resisting. They are challenging structures that perpetuate their continued oppression and exploitation. Their resistance and organizing are evident at the Churches Witnessing with Migrants (CWWM) consultation and at the International Assembly of Migrants and Refugees (IAMR). Therefore, we echo the call of the Campaign for Peoples Goals for Sustainable Development for a truly just and transformative development framework aiming to redistribute wealth, power and resources between countries, between rich and poor and between men and women. This is a call for “development justice” whose overall goal is the full realization of human rights for all, and the individual and collective well-being of the people and the environment.
- Migrants are truly the ones who speak best about their hopes and aspirations and about how to advance and protect their rights and interests. We must prosper the critical principle of representation by and leadership of migrants and migrant organizations in all levels of policy engagement and decision-making processes that are about them and affect them.
- The biblical injunction is this: “Keep loving each other like family. Don’t neglect to open up your homes to guests, because by doing this some have been hosts to angels without knowing it” (Hebrews 13:1-2). Migrants are not just neighbors; they are persons equal in rights and dignity like everyone else. Taking migrant concerns as our concerns, and asserting migrant rights as human rights, means we are entertaining angels, no longer unawares, but with full knowledge of who they are and what their aspirations are: bearers of God’s likeness and instruments of God’s compassion and hospitality, justice and peace, abundance and sustainability.
- Finally, the intersections of migration with human rights, sustainability and development justice are crucial and intrinsic. Therefore, we press all governments and other regional and multilateral bodies to abide by, improve upon, and develop new normative frameworks within the United Nations, by which they, including the private sector and other stakeholders, can demonstrate behavior and action that fulfill their responsibilities and obligations to respect, uphold and protect migrants and their human rights. In particular, through the following:
a) Institute a mechanism to review periodically the adherence of states to instruments for the human rights of migrants. Conduct this periodic review under the purview and auspices of the United Nations with the conducting body having the mandate of the UN General Assembly to call the attention of states and stakeholders in migrations to violations of the rights of migrants and to propose necessary policy recommendations for consideration of the states and entities concerned.
b) Promote dialogues of cooperation between particular countries of origin and countries of destination that will focus on joint actions and services for migrants, especially those in distress.
c) Promote the regulation by states of private recruitment agencies and private financing agencies providing loans to migrants. Conduct transparent, accountable and effective investigation and prosecution of private actors exploiting the vulnerability of migrants.
d) Adopt and implement policies that shall protect sectors of migrants in vulnerable conditions, including domestic workers; undocumented migrants and migrants in similar irregular situations; low- and semi-skilled migrants; migrants in conflict situations; migrants affected by climate change; and migrant women, youths and children.
e) End frameworks conceived and implemented by migrant-receiving countries that classify migrants as threats to national security.
f) Urge governments to ratify and implement relevant United Nations and International Labor Organization (ILO) treaties and conventions, and amend their national laws to be consistent with such treaties and conventions, especially the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families and the ILO Convention 189 concerning decent work for domestic workers.
g) End schemes designed by governments and other entities to extract cheap labor from refugees and migrants.
- Our call is to do justice as we oppose forced migration and speak against clear and present violations of the rights of migrants and their families. We pray that our responses remain true to faith imperatives for compassion and hospitality, for justice and peace, for human dignity and human rights, and for freedom and sustainability, which we hold and share with other religions and faith communities. We pray that our responses do not fall short of the abundance of God’s unconditional love and profuse radical hospitality.
Church Center for the United Nations
New York City
1 and 2 October 2013
This advocacy paper was the product of consultations by some 100 representatives of sixty-one grassroots, local, regional and international organizations of migrants and religious and ecumenical groups which met on 1 and 2 October 2013 at the Church Center for the United Nations in New York City for the Fourth International Consultation of the Churches Witnessing With Migrants. The consultation was held in conjunction with the 2013 Second High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development by the General Assembly of the United Nations. For more information on CWWM, contact Mr. Mervin Toquero of the National Council of Churches in the Philippines at email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org.
 According to the Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants, marriage migrants are those whomarry foreigners and live outside their home countries. In such marriage, many of whom are women, the migrant leaves the home country and in the country of the spouse will face different forms of discrimination, exploitation and domestic violence. See http://www.apmigrants.org/papers/09.htm.
 This regime of international trade, finance and investment, under the auspices of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and other international financial institutions, has spawned agreements and arrangements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) that perpetuate the continued commodification (also commoditization) of migrants.
 The formation of the International Migrants Alliance, Migrante International, and the Alianza de Ex-Braceros del Norte, and the holding of the International Assembly of Migrants and Refugees (IAMR) and the Churches Witnessing with Migrants (CWWM), among others, demonstrates the resolve by migrants and migrant organizations, including religions and faith communities, in resisting dehumanization, marginalization and disempowerment. The CWWM in New York and the IAMR is the fourth convening of these groups.
 These seven calls echo and add to the positions submitted by the International Migrants Alliance to the 2013 Second United Nations High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development.